<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TechTalk e-conomic blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com</link>
	<description>the technical voice of e-conomic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:36:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solution to the trailing slash problem in Lotus Domino by Tue Skaarup</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/lotus-domino-dsapi-filter/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Tue Skaarup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=555#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>Hi Roman,

Thanks for commenting.

Indeed, using Canonical tag would be an indicator to the search engines which URL version is the correct. But there are 2 problems with that approach:

1) Backlinks will be divided between the 2 URL versions, and you cannot count on search engines to transfer full backlink value to the canonical URL. Just like a 301 redirect. Or worse actually, because the canonical tag is not a strong directive, like the 301 is.

On top of that, some search engines might not honor the canonical tag at all, or there will be a delay before the 90-99% backlink value is transferred to the canonical URL.

2) Canonical tag should basically not be used to fix structural problems in URLs, like fx. the trailing slash. Better uses for the canonical tags are URLs with tracking parameters, like ad/campaign links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roman,</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting.</p>
<p>Indeed, using Canonical tag would be an indicator to the search engines which URL version is the correct. But there are 2 problems with that approach:</p>
<p>1) Backlinks will be divided between the 2 URL versions, and you cannot count on search engines to transfer full backlink value to the canonical URL. Just like a 301 redirect. Or worse actually, because the canonical tag is not a strong directive, like the 301 is.</p>
<p>On top of that, some search engines might not honor the canonical tag at all, or there will be a delay before the 90-99% backlink value is transferred to the canonical URL.</p>
<p>2) Canonical tag should basically not be used to fix structural problems in URLs, like fx. the trailing slash. Better uses for the canonical tags are URLs with tracking parameters, like ad/campaign links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solution to the trailing slash problem in Lotus Domino by Roman Kopač</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/lotus-domino-dsapi-filter/#comment-2290</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman Kopač</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=555#comment-2290</guid>
		<description>Or you could just use link tag with rel=&quot;canonical&quot; http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could just use link tag with rel=&#8221;canonical&#8221; <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solution to the trailing slash problem in Lotus Domino by En historie om ekstraordinær service &#124; e-conomic blog</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/lotus-domino-dsapi-filter/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>En historie om ekstraordinær service &#124; e-conomic blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=555#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>[...] nu med det tekniske, det er ikke kernen i historien (selvom jeg meget gerne snakker detaljer om DSAPI filter løsningen på TechTalk bloggen). Kernen er reaktionen fra Tron Systems. Her er hvad der [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nu med det tekniske, det er ikke kernen i historien (selvom jeg meget gerne snakker detaljer om DSAPI filter løsningen på TechTalk bloggen). Kernen er reaktionen fra Tron Systems. Her er hvad der [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solution to the trailing slash problem in Lotus Domino by A story about extraordinary service</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/lotus-domino-dsapi-filter/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>A story about extraordinary service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=555#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>[...] details of the task are not important for this story (if you are dying to know more, here is more details about the DSAPI filter on our Lotus Domino servers), but the reaction from Tron Systems [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] details of the task are not important for this story (if you are dying to know more, here is more details about the DSAPI filter on our Lotus Domino servers), but the reaction from Tron Systems [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Improving API performance beyond data classes by Bättre API-prestanda utöver dataklasser.</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/improving-api-performance-beyond-data-classes/#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator>Bättre API-prestanda utöver dataklasser.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=48#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Certificate issues for small number of integrations by e-conomic</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/certificate-issues-for-small-number-of-integrations/#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>e-conomic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 08:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=503#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>Hvorfor Oracle giver en fejlkode i.f.m. API-integration til e-conomic kan jeg desværre ikke hjælpe med.
Men der har været lidt problemer med vores certifikater. Fra 1. august kl. 1 om natten til kl. 21 om aftenen var det sidste certifikat i certifikatrækkefølgen ikke online. Men det er fikset nu, så I bør ikke opleve flere problemer.

Mvh
Carsten, e-conomic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hvorfor Oracle giver en fejlkode i.f.m. API-integration til e-conomic kan jeg desværre ikke hjælpe med.<br />
Men der har været lidt problemer med vores certifikater. Fra 1. august kl. 1 om natten til kl. 21 om aftenen var det sidste certifikat i certifikatrækkefølgen ikke online. Men det er fikset nu, så I bør ikke opleve flere problemer.</p>
<p>Mvh<br />
Carsten, e-conomic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Certificate issues for small number of integrations by ag-informatik</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/certificate-issues-for-small-number-of-integrations/#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>ag-informatik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=503#comment-2055</guid>
		<description>Vi havde problemer med at connecte fra vores applikation 30. juni. Vi fik løst dem ved at downloade nye certifikater fra GlobalSign.
Nu har vi problemer igen, med en fejlkode fra Oracle, som jeg aldrig har set og som ikke er dokumenteret.
Har I kendskab til , at andre stadig har problemer?
/Jan Ahlberg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vi havde problemer med at connecte fra vores applikation 30. juni. Vi fik løst dem ved at downloade nye certifikater fra GlobalSign.<br />
Nu har vi problemer igen, med en fejlkode fra Oracle, som jeg aldrig har set og som ikke er dokumenteret.<br />
Har I kendskab til , at andre stadig har problemer?<br />
/Jan Ahlberg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Certificate issues for small number of integrations by Har du problemer med din integration og certifikater? &#124; e-conomic blog</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/certificate-issues-for-small-number-of-integrations/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>Har du problemer med din integration og certifikater? &#124; e-conomic blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=503#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>[...] En lille andel af vores integrationspartnere har haft problemer med vores nye certifikat. Hvis du ikke har oplevet nogen problemer, kan du se bort fra det følgende &#8211; men hvis du har haft problemer, kan det betale sig at læse videre herunder eller se indlægget om emnet på vores TechTalk-blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] En lille andel af vores integrationspartnere har haft problemer med vores nye certifikat. Hvis du ikke har oplevet nogen problemer, kan du se bort fra det følgende &#8211; men hvis du har haft problemer, kan det betale sig at læse videre herunder eller se indlægget om emnet på vores TechTalk-blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New E-conomic API Forum Launched! by Tue Skaarup</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/new-e-conomic-api-forum-launched/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>Tue Skaarup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 17:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=140#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>Hi Anonymous,

No, the API forum is not down. Running 100% uptime actually.

I just realized that you probably used the URL written in this old post. The correct URL to the API forum is http://apiforum.e-conomic.com/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anonymous,</p>
<p>No, the API forum is not down. Running 100% uptime actually.</p>
<p>I just realized that you probably used the URL written in this old post. The correct URL to the API forum is <a href="http://apiforum.e-conomic.com/">http://apiforum.e-conomic.com/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New E-conomic API Forum Launched! by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/new-e-conomic-api-forum-launched/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=140#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Cannot connect to the API forum. Is it down?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot connect to the API forum. Is it down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Increased Server Capacity by e-conomic är snabbare</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/increased-server-capacity/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>e-conomic är snabbare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=448#comment-784</guid>
		<description>[...] danska kollegor skrivit om så har e-conomic satt hastigheten i fokus. Därför har vi nyligen ökat vår serverkapacitet med 50%. Vi har också lagt om mycket av tekniken bakom e-conomic för att öka [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] danska kollegor skrivit om så har e-conomic satt hastigheten i fokus. Därför har vi nyligen ökat vår serverkapacitet med 50%. Vi har också lagt om mycket av tekniken bakom e-conomic för att öka [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maintenance on e-conomic core servers (Update) by Magnus G</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/maintenance-on-e-conomic-core-servers-update/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=394#comment-609</guid>
		<description>You guys are fantastic!
Im impressed!
Go out and have some beer in the cool night...!
(Maybe this was your plan...:-)
Well done!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are fantastic!<br />
Im impressed!<br />
Go out and have some beer in the cool night&#8230;!<br />
(Maybe this was your plan&#8230;:-)<br />
Well done!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maintenance on e-conomic core servers (Update) by Thomas Harvigsen</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/maintenance-on-e-conomic-core-servers-update/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Harvigsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=394#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Hi Rune 

e-conomic will definitely be available again by 12:00 tomorrow. It is likely that it will be some time before that. 

When we re-open, you will see it on this blog, and on all other country blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rune </p>
<p>e-conomic will definitely be available again by 12:00 tomorrow. It is likely that it will be some time before that. </p>
<p>When we re-open, you will see it on this blog, and on all other country blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maintenance on e-conomic core servers (Update) by Tue Skaarup</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/maintenance-on-e-conomic-core-servers-update/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>Tue Skaarup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=394#comment-607</guid>
		<description>@Torben: &quot;Even that the weather isn’t the best today...&quot;

No roof in that hosting company? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Torben: &#8220;Even that the weather isn’t the best today&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>No roof in that hosting company? <img src='http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maintenance on e-conomic core servers (Update) by Rune</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/maintenance-on-e-conomic-core-servers-update/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Rune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=394#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Are you done by 12.00 on Sunday?

I am planning to do some accounting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you done by 12.00 on Sunday?</p>
<p>I am planning to do some accounting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maintenance on e-conomic core servers (Update) by Claus Aaberg</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/maintenance-on-e-conomic-core-servers-update/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus Aaberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=394#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Good to hear and it is really nice that you keep us posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear and it is really nice that you keep us posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maintenance on e-conomic core servers (Update) by Markus Åberg</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/maintenance-on-e-conomic-core-servers-update/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Åberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=394#comment-604</guid>
		<description>Great - keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great &#8211; keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 20 minutes downtime today by At begå hybris &#124; e-conomic blog</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/e-conomic_unavailable/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>At begå hybris &#124; e-conomic blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=378#comment-575</guid>
		<description>[...] førstkommende mandag på ca. 20 min. At det ikke skyldtes os selv &#8211; men at en internet udbyders system ikke spillede trods gode ord som ”dobbeltstrøm” er bedøvende ligegyldigt. At  det ramte mange andre [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] førstkommende mandag på ca. 20 min. At det ikke skyldtes os selv &#8211; men at en internet udbyders system ikke spillede trods gode ord som ”dobbeltstrøm” er bedøvende ligegyldigt. At  det ramte mange andre [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to speed up your daily workflows by Klavs Petersen</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/how-to-speed-up-your-daily-workflows/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Klavs Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=328#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Great post and very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Planned maintenance by Move to faster storage &#8211; phase 1 complete</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/planned-maintenance/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Move to faster storage &#8211; phase 1 complete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=355#comment-453</guid>
		<description>[...] happy to announce that phase 1 of our previously mentioned storage upgrade has now been completed &#8211; and rather successfully at that, with e-conomic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] happy to announce that phase 1 of our previously mentioned storage upgrade has now been completed &#8211; and rather successfully at that, with e-conomic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to speed up your daily workflows by Kim Sneum Maden</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/how-to-speed-up-your-daily-workflows/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Sneum Maden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 07:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=328#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Smashing. Thank you Munster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smashing. Thank you Munster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Releasing new languages and currencies &#8211; on popular demand by Martin Havemann</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/releasing-new-languages-and-currencies-on-popular-demand/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Havemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=298#comment-409</guid>
		<description>In case anybody should have missed reading the date on this blog entry, here is some more information on the languages and currencies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_language
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_franca
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_currency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case anybody should have missed reading the date on this blog entry, here is some more information on the languages and currencies.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_language">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_language</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_franca">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_franca</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_currency">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_currency</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Releasing new languages and currencies &#8211; on popular demand by Johannes</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/releasing-new-languages-and-currencies-on-popular-demand/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Johannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=298#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Hahaha.. sending out invoices in Repulic Credits is killer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha.. sending out invoices in Repulic Credits is killer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service disruption 1-2 April by Konserwacja systemu rozpoczęta, e-conomic jest niedostępny &#124; Blog internetowego systemu księgowego e-conomic</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/service-disruption-1-2-april/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Konserwacja systemu rozpoczęta, e-conomic jest niedostępny &#124; Blog internetowego systemu księgowego e-conomic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=288#comment-403</guid>
		<description>[...] TechTalk blog, w którym znajdują się aktualne informacje na temat postępów [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechTalk blog, w którym znajdują się aktualne informacje na temat postępów [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service disruption 1-2 April by Se inicia la parada temporal de funcionamiento de e-conomic &#124; e-conomic</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/service-disruption-1-2-april/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Se inicia la parada temporal de funcionamiento de e-conomic &#124; e-conomic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=288#comment-401</guid>
		<description>[...] visitar el blog Techtalk blog para conocer todas las novedades que se están produciendo en el servicio de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] visitar el blog Techtalk blog para conocer todas las novedades que se están produciendo en el servicio de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service disruption 1-2 April by Downtime initiated, E-conomic is unavailable</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/service-disruption-1-2-april/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Downtime initiated, E-conomic is unavailable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=288#comment-400</guid>
		<description>[...] the TechTalk blog for updates on the progress of the service [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the TechTalk blog for updates on the progress of the service [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service disruption 1-2 April by Den planlagte nedetid er nu sat i gang &#124; e-conomic blog</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/service-disruption-1-2-april/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Den planlagte nedetid er nu sat i gang &#124; e-conomic blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=288#comment-399</guid>
		<description>[...] kan besøge vores TechTalk blog og følge med i processen imens nedetiden står [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kan besøge vores TechTalk blog og følge med i processen imens nedetiden står [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nighttime downtime by Inger Lilja</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/nighttime-downtime/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Inger Lilja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=269#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Dear Hartvig,

I really wish this was an April&#039;s fool joke (although I think we could have come up with something slightly funnier than a downtime warning:)), but it is in fact the ugly truth.

We have scheduled the application downtime for the Easter holidays beginning at 10 pm on Maundy Thursday, which is a bank holiday in some countries, and lasting until 6 pm on Good Friday, which is a bank holiday in most of the Christian world - in fact in all the countries that e-conomic is currently represented in. 

In this way, we believe that the downtime becomes less of an inconvenience to the average e-conomic user.

As a SaaS provider, we have to update our platform now and them to improve our performance. We deeply regret the impacts of the scheduled downtime on the operation of your API integration. 

The downtime is scheduled to a maximum of 20 hours to allow for testing of application performance for regular users as well as for API users, before we restore service.

I do agree with you that the downtime notification was submitted with rather short notice. We have recently included this information in newsletters as well as on the log-in pages of our websites, but based on your feedback, we will try to reach even more users through other communication channels. 

Should we be able to restore service earlier than expected, we will of course notify you here on the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Hartvig,</p>
<p>I really wish this was an April&#8217;s fool joke (although I think we could have come up with something slightly funnier than a downtime warning:)), but it is in fact the ugly truth.</p>
<p>We have scheduled the application downtime for the Easter holidays beginning at 10 pm on Maundy Thursday, which is a bank holiday in some countries, and lasting until 6 pm on Good Friday, which is a bank holiday in most of the Christian world &#8211; in fact in all the countries that e-conomic is currently represented in. </p>
<p>In this way, we believe that the downtime becomes less of an inconvenience to the average e-conomic user.</p>
<p>As a SaaS provider, we have to update our platform now and them to improve our performance. We deeply regret the impacts of the scheduled downtime on the operation of your API integration. </p>
<p>The downtime is scheduled to a maximum of 20 hours to allow for testing of application performance for regular users as well as for API users, before we restore service.</p>
<p>I do agree with you that the downtime notification was submitted with rather short notice. We have recently included this information in newsletters as well as on the log-in pages of our websites, but based on your feedback, we will try to reach even more users through other communication channels. </p>
<p>Should we be able to restore service earlier than expected, we will of course notify you here on the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nighttime downtime by Hartvig</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/nighttime-downtime/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Hartvig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=269#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Duh - this must of course be an April fool. Can&#039;t believe you got me :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh &#8211; this must of course be an April fool. Can&#8217;t believe you got me <img src='http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nighttime downtime by Hartvig</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/nighttime-downtime/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Hartvig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.e-conomic.com/?p=269#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Are you seriously taking down an ERP for 20 hours? In a non-weekend?

While it&#039;s holiday season in Denmark, the world isn&#039;t entirely Christian and I think this is a huge mistake for a SaaS trying to be international.

Not only is 20 hours of downtime for a SaaS provider a weird thing [that&#039;s 0.2% downtime on a year basis!], but doing this outside a weekend seems like an odd decision - especially as you promote your APIs for people - like us - building stores on E-conomic. 

This basically means that we can&#039;t process orders for 20 hours in a row, as we&#039;re unable to generate invoices, hence not allowed to charge money (at least from Danish legislation).

And this without any direct e-mails to customers warning about the downtime (at least we haven&#039;t been given any warning) - why?

I love e-conomic, but I think this is nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you seriously taking down an ERP for 20 hours? In a non-weekend?</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s holiday season in Denmark, the world isn&#8217;t entirely Christian and I think this is a huge mistake for a SaaS trying to be international.</p>
<p>Not only is 20 hours of downtime for a SaaS provider a weird thing [that's 0.2% downtime on a year basis!], but doing this outside a weekend seems like an odd decision &#8211; especially as you promote your APIs for people &#8211; like us &#8211; building stores on E-conomic. </p>
<p>This basically means that we can&#8217;t process orders for 20 hours in a row, as we&#8217;re unable to generate invoices, hence not allowed to charge money (at least from Danish legislation).</p>
<p>And this without any direct e-mails to customers warning about the downtime (at least we haven&#8217;t been given any warning) &#8211; why?</p>
<p>I love e-conomic, but I think this is nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

